Built for SQE1 Candidates · 2026/27

SQE1-style questions, mapped to the SRA spec.

Practise exactly what the SQE1 tests. Every question follows the SRA's SQE1 specification, topic by topic and subtopic by subtopic — with every option explained, custom mock exams, and answer-habit insights that show where your marks leak.

Start free with five exam-style questions a day. The 7-day Ultra trial is there when you're ready.

4,977
SQE1-style questions
as of 17 Oct 2026
136
SQE1 spec sections, mapped
2 × 85
January 2027 SQE1 papers, simulated
SQEase|Property Practice
OPEN BOOK
Question 2 of 10Co-ownership · Trusts of land

Two individuals purchased a residential property together in 2018, which was registered in both their names. At the time of purchase, a Form A restriction was entered in the proprietorship register. One of the owners has recently passed away, and the surviving owner wishes to sell the property to a third-party buyer. The surviving owner’s solicitor has obtained a certified copy of the deceased owner’s death certificate. What steps must the surviving owner take in order to convey good title to the buyer?

Tap an answer — the full explanation is instant.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

In an SRA-commissioned survey, around one in five SQE candidates (21%) said training and materials cost them £10,000 or more. SQEase plans start at £30 a month on the web, and the free plan costs nothing.Source: SRA, Solicitors Qualifying Examination: Phase Three Evaluation (18 December 2025)

See plans →

Your exam, mapped — then practised, subtopic by subtopic.

Stage 4 — Lex explains. Why the right answer is right, and why the tempting one isn't.

Subject
SRA subtopic
Question
Lex explains
Custom Practice Example
FLK1Tort· 6 SRA subtopics
  • Negligence
  • Defences
  • Vicarious liability
  • Occupiers' liability
  • Product liability
  • Nuisance
FLK1TortDefencesSQE Level

A defendant negligently caused a high-speed collision with the claimant, who suffered rib fractures and a punctured lung. Medical evidence confirms that while the injuries would have occurred regardless, wearing a seatbelt would have significantly reduced their severity. The defendant admits negligence but argues for a reduction in damages due to the claimant's failure to wear a seatbelt.

What is the most likely percentage by which the court will reduce the claimant's damages for contributory negligence?

Lex

B is the trap: under Froom v Butcher the 25% reduction applies only where a seatbelt would have avoided the injury entirely. Here it would merely have lessened the severity — so the 15% bracket applies, and the answer is D.

Source: Froom v Butcher [1976] · Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945

One checked question, for one subtopic, of one subject. SQEase maps questions across the whole SRA specification.

Three question styles, matched to the moment.

Not all practice is equal. SQEase offers three question styles for different contexts — quick recall on the go, focused application at your desk, or long SQE-style stems whenever you want them. Pick by what you need today: they're styles, not levels.

In the July 2026 SQE1, 42% of candidates passed — 47% of those sitting for the first time. You get 3 attempts at each FLK paper within a 6-year window, so make the first one count.

Source: SRA, SQE1 July 2026 Statistical Report (29 September 2026)
Open Book: untimed, Lex on hand
Closed Book: 108 s a question
SQE Simulation: 2 × 85, Jan 2027 shape
Filter by SRA subtopic

Mock and Simulation on Core and up.

Example Question
SQE Level

A solicitor is acting for a client on a commercial property acquisition. During due diligence, the solicitor discovers that the seller's company is subject to a winding-up petition that has not been disclosed. The client has already exchanged contracts with a 10% deposit and completion is due in 14 days. The solicitor also becomes aware that the client intends to sub-sell the property immediately upon completion to a connected party at a significant uplift, raising potential concerns under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. What should the solicitor do first?

AComplete as planned, because contracts have already been exchanged.
BConsider the money-laundering concern and, if it remains, make a disclosure to the National Crime Agency before acting further.
CTell the client about the concern and ask them to explain the sub-sale.
DRescind the contract for the seller's failure to disclose the petition.
EAsk the seller to withdraw the winding-up petition before completion.

Full SQE-style questions: long client-fact stems, subtle distractors, no padding.

Start free: five SQE1-style questions a day, with every option explained.

Try it free

From your notes,
to your test.

Bring your materials however you have them. SQEase reads them, maps the legal principles, and builds SQE1-style questions straight from your own revision — each one checked before you see it.

  • Any formatHandwritten photos, PDFs, Word, slides — or import straight from Google Drive.
  • Mapped to the SRA specSQEase reads every page and files each question against its SRA subtopic.
  • You choose what to buildPick the subtopics you want from each document. Nothing is generated until you choose, and the ones you skip stay available for up to 30 days.
Recall flashcards tooTurn your notes into spaced-repetition cards too — every card checked against your notes. See it in depth
Building a questionExample
Extract
Research
Draft
Check
FLK2Land Law›Co-ownership Checked

Two friends bought a flat together to live in, holding it as beneficial joint tenants. No declaration was made about how the equity would be shared. One of them has now died, and the survivor wishes to sell the flat to a buyer.

Which of the following best describes how the deceased's interest in the flat passes?

AIt passes under the deceased's will to the named beneficiary.
BIt passes to the surviving co-owner automatically by the right of survivorship.
CIt passes to the deceased's next of kin under the intestacy rules.
DIt is divided equally between the survivor and the deceased's estate.
EIt can pass only once the joint tenancy has been severed by the court.
Lex

On the death of a beneficial joint tenant the interest passes to the survivor by the right of survivorship — it does not pass under the will or the intestacy rules. A is the classic trap: survivorship overrides any gift made by the will.

Right of survivorship (jus accrescendi) · severance: Law of Property Act 1925, s.36(2)

Four ways Lex helps you through SQE1.

Lex isn't a chatbot bolted on the side. It explains every answer, builds exams on demand, flags the facts that matter, and coaches how you answer — grounded in a curated legal knowledge base, not guesswork.

Understand every wrong answer, not just the right one

Lex searches a curated legal knowledge base before composing each response — so its explanations are built from retrieved material, not memory or guesswork.

Per-option rationale
Interactive "Why is this wrong?" buttons for every incorrect answer choice
Context-aware explanations
References the exact statute, case-law principle, or scenario detail from your question
There when you're practising
Ask in Open Book practice and in review — switched off in timed mocks, just like the real exam.
Practice & review
Lex
Why is option C wrong here? I thought exchange of contracts creates a binding obligation.
Lex

You're right that exchange creates a binding contract — but the question asks about legal title, not contractual obligation. These are distinct stages in English land law:

Exchange → Equitable interest passes to buyer

Completion → TR1 executed

Registration → Legal title passes (s.27 LRA 2002)

Source: Land Registration Act 2002, s.27 · SQEase legal knowledge base

Tell Lex what you need. It builds the exam.

Ask in your own words — even "what are my weakest areas?" — and Lex assembles a tailored session, then hands it to you ready to start.

Just ask in plain English
No menus to configure — describe the test you want and Lex sets the subjects, question style and length
Targets your weak spots
Lex reads your performance and builds sessions around the subtopics you keep getting wrong
Your library and our bank
Questions are drawn from your uploads and the SQEase question bank
Lex exam builder
Lex
What are my weakest areas, and how can I improve on them?
Lex

Your three weakest areas — let's build a focused test around them:

1
Directors' duties
Business Law and Practice
54%
2
Negligence — duty of care
Tort
58%
3
Express trusts — formalities
Trusts
61%
Proposed test configuration
15
Questions
27
Minutes
Timed
Quick FireApplicationSQE Level
Start this test Modify

Spots the traps before they cost you

Lex marks the key facts, legal triggers and red herrings right in the scenario — hover or tap any highlight to see why it matters.

Key facts
The details the correct answer actually turns on
Red herrings
The reassurances put there to pull you off course
Legal triggers
The statute or rule the facts quietly engage
Annotated scenario

A buyer completes the purchase of a . The seller mentions a , but assures the buyer this .

Key fact Red herring Legal trigger
Hover or tap any highlight to see why it matters

Coaching that trains how you answer

Reason first, get evaluated, then eliminate the distractors with Lex checking every call — the exam technique marks are won and lost on.

  1. Reason firstThe options stay hidden while you commit your own analysis — you apply the law before any answer choice can anchor your thinking.
  2. Lex evaluates your thinkingLex reads what you wrote, confirms what you got right and flags what you missed — gaps surface before they cost you the mark.
  3. Eliminate, with Lex checkingStrike the wrong options one by one with Lex confirming each call, then commit the answer with the reasoning to back it up.
Lex's Hands-on Coach

A manufacturer agrees to supply goods for £480,000; the buyer pays a £120,000 deposit. Before delivery, new legislation bans making the goods without a licence that cannot be obtained. What is the position on the contract and the deposit?

AFrustrated; under s.1(2) LR(FC)A 1943 the £120,000 deposit is recoverable, subject to the court’s discretion to let the manufacturer keep proven expenses.
BVoid from the outset, so the full £120,000 is returned with no deductions.
CA breach, so the buyer recovers the deposit and claims damages for non-delivery.
DFrustrated, but the 1943 Act does not cover supply contracts, so the deposit is returned with no deductions.
ENot frustrated — supervening illegality only suspends performance until the licence position changes.
Correct — A is the best answer.

Meet Lex yourself. Fifteen messages a day on the free plan.

Try it free
Your performance
Contract Law · last 7 days
Trending up
Vitiating factors84%
Termination & breach61%
Privity & third parties38%
Answer habit spottedUltra
You changed 3 correct answers to wrong this week. Your first instinct was right 78% of the time — trust it.

Know how you really answer

SQE1 is as much about technique as knowledge. SQEase tracks your performance down to the subtopic and surfaces the answering habits — second-guessing and pacing — that quietly cost you marks, so you can fix the pattern, not just the fact.

Subtopic-level masteryCore+
See exactly which SRA subtopics you have nailed and which still need work — not just a single overall score.
Answer-habit coachingUltra
After each sitting, Lex shows when you talked yourself out of a correct first instinct, and how your typical time per question compares with the 108-second SQE1 pace.
Straight into your planPro+
Your weakest subtopics feed your Study Roadmap and Daily Challenge, so the next thing you practise is the thing that matters.

…and a roadmap that turns those gaps into a planPro

Your weakest subtopics are prioritised and scheduled across the weeks to your exam — so you always know what to revise next.

Study RoadmapFLK1
Contract7 subtopics
72%Med
Business Law & Practice12 subtopics
45%High
Tort6 subtopics
88%
Dispute Resolution14 subtopics
31%Focus
Legal System of England & Wales5 subtopics
64%Med
47Days to FLK1
68%Coverage
74%Reliability
This week's plan
MonBLP
TueDispute Res.
Wed—
ThuTort
FriContract
Sat—
SunLegal System

Every new question is checked before you see it. Try five free today.

Try it free

New questions are answered again — independently.

Before a new question reaches you, it is answered again from scratch, without being shown the proposed answer — and both answers must agree. If anything is in doubt, the question is held back.

Modelled on the official SRA samples

We measured all 220 of the SRA’s published sample questions and turned them into targets. New SQE1-style questions are checked against those targets as they’re written.

Rates and deadlines checked against UK sources

Where a question states a rate, time limit, threshold or statute, it is checked against UK sources.

Your uploads, the same check

Questions built from your notes go through the same check as new bank questions before you see them.

Pay for the part you actually use.

SQEase plans start at £30 a month on the web — cancel anytime.

Core
A complete practice product — the full question bank, unlimited exams, and Lex to explain every answer and build the tests you ask for.
£30/month
Billed monthly · Cancel any time
Start free on Core
  • Full curated question bank — every subject, all three question styles (Quick Fire, Application, SQE Level)
  • Unlimited practice & mock exams
  • Daily Challenge access
  • Ask Lex — instant Q&A with a full rationale for every option, right and wrong
  • Lex builds your tests — describe the test you want in plain English and Lex builds it
  • Fair-use unlimited Lex — no query caps on any paid plan
  • Flashcards — spaced-repetition recall built from your uploads
  • Subtopic-level performance analytics
  • Mapped to the SQE1 spec — every question tagged to its SRA section
  • 5 resource uploads a month (digital & handwritten)
  • Google Drive integration
  • SQE Simulation — FLK papers in the January 2027 shape, 2 × 85 at 108 s a question
A complete bank of practice and analytics to mark and correct your own work.
Ultra
Lex coaches how you answer — technique, habits and hands-on guidance, question by question.
£80/month
Billed monthly · Cancel any time
Start free on Ultra
  • Everything in Pro, plus:
  • Lex Coaching — hands-on answering technique: reason first, commit, then compare against Lex
  • Answer Habits — the habits costing you marks: changed answers, first-instinct accuracy, typical time per question
  • Annotation mode — Lex highlights the facts that matter (and the red herrings) in every scenario
  • 25 resource uploads a month (digital & handwritten)
  • Priority support
For candidates who want Lex working for them, not just available.

Swipe, or tap a plan above, to compare all three.

Every account starts on the free plan: five exam-style questions a day. The 7-day Ultra trial takes a card and starts inside; cancel by day 7 and pay nothing. It includes 10 uploads and 10 subtopics from your own material for the whole trial.

Or start on the free plan

4,977 SQE1-style questions (as of 17 Oct 2026) · filed to 136 sections of the SQE1 spec · new questions answered again, independently, before you see them · cancel in two clicks

Common questions

Free plan: five questions a day · 7-day Ultra trial when you’re ready

Your SQE1 is in your hands.

Answer your first SQE1-style questions in the next two minutes. Five a day, free, for as long as you want.

Private by design: we delete your notes once your questions are built, they are never used to train AI models, and your materials stay scoped to your account.